Monorail?

1

Whenever I have brought this up on other forums, others tend to have very strong feelings about it on both ends. Some feel it is a gimmick and ineffici

ent, others feel it is the greatest thing to happen to transit since the wheel. Unfortunately, between these two opposites, a rational and realistic view on monorails tend to be overlooked.

Monorails are a fantastic way to introduce grade separated transit into urban areas, all at a fraction of the cost of tunneling. It is significantly more expensive than at-grade light rail and bus ROWs, so along moderate use corridors it is not feasable. Unfortunately, when monorail is proposed it tends to be along these kinds of corridors, so what ends up happening is that light rail ends up being chosen and monorail continues to keep its stereotype of being failed technology, gimmick transit, etc. However, along corridors such as Eglinton and Queen, monorail may be a perfect fit.

And yes, monorails do have high capacities. Hitachi has built numerous systems that have capacities of 300,000+ per day and trains that can carry approximately 1000 passengers.

Main problem: Yet another separate fleet

0

Unfortunately, a new track type means that we would need another orphan vehicle fleet, another garage, and so on. A small fleet is inherently less resilient than a big fleet -- you can't pull in replacements from elsewhere. A single line is inherently less resilient than a network -- you can't route around a blockage.

That's why Scarborough RT was a bad idea here -- we already had streetcars, subways, trolleys, heavy rail, and buses.

We should stick to technologies we already have -- there's plenty of them. We should make them more resilient and powerful by expanding their vehicle fleet, the track, and the number of lines.

Well, sir, there's nothing

0

Well, sir, there's nothing on earth like a genuine, bona fide, electrified, six-car monorail! What'd I say? Monorail!

It put Ogdenville, Brockway and North Haverbrook on the map...

There are several reasons

0

There are several reasons why the Scarborough RT was a bad idea besides using a separate technology lol...

Anyways, I am aware there would be challenges involved, but long term investment in this kind of technology may be worth a look. Elevating standard rail would be much less pleasant than a monorail beam. And best of all, construction above the ground should be significantly cheaper than building underground.

Great conversation, wrong area of the site!

0

I've moved this conversation to this new thread.